There’s a shift that I’ve spotted at the senior level

More of the CVs I see tick every box. They quantify impact, they tell the story, properly and that would usually mean, “they’re worth a screening call”.

It’s very different to how it was even 12 months ago.

It’s going to lead to a significant time sink for internal hiring teams and hiring managers.

Unless you’ve got somebody at the front end who knows how to properly interview and assess talent, you’re just going to waste more time. And time, in this context? That’s bad hires, wasted budget, slower growth, internal friction… take your pick.

How many leaders/managers have had proper interview training?

How many managers know how to properly score an interview, read body language, take detailed notes, probe deeply into what somebody has achieved?

I’d argue it’s fewer than you’d think.

Most people become managers due to being good at the job they do. They then become responsible for hiring people. They usually learn how to interview from somebody else who didn’t have interview training.

How it used to work (in a lot of businesses):

A need arises because Jeff handed his notice in. They’d dust off an old Job Description (probably from a few years ago), change the last reviewed date in the footer to today’s date and then post it on a job board (and probably send it out to a few recruiters). When it comes to interviewing, they’d either look for past interview questions or if they couldn’t find them, they’d use their trusty friend, Mr/Mrs. google for some.

Simple.

We had a candidate last month who looked perfect on paper. But five minutes into the interview, it was clear they couldn’t evidence half of it… (Has it happened to you yet?)

Nowadays, they go onto their chosen AI model, ask it for a JD for a _______ role. Then ask it to write an advert. Then get it to create some interview questions. If they’re really good with AI, they’ll also ask for a scoring matrix.

On the candidate side. They’re wise to this. They upload the JD to their chosen AI model (potentially the same one as the hiring company) alongside their CV and they ask it to “tailor my CV to this job”.

Few seconds later, and depending on how good they are at prompting, out pops a CV that looks like a perfect fit for the role.

They hit apply. The CV does the job. A few days later, they’re invited to interview.

They don’t remember applying for the role. So they dig out the JD, upload it to their model, and ask: “What questions might I get?”

Then they go one step further: “Based on my CV, how should I answer that?”

So, you now have a bunch of candidates with cracking CVs, ready prepared answers to your questions and a bit of initiative.

So what happens when you’ve got polished answers, polished CVs… and no one in the room trained to tell the difference? Do you see the problem yet?

In a market this competitive, if you can’t tell what’s real at interview… someone else will.

That’s the bit we focus on at Corvus People, getting past the polish.

We ask better questions (We often hear “that’s a good question, I’ve not heard that one before”) and we know what to look for.

It’s what we do every day, and if that kind of sharp thinking would help you, just give me a shout.

By Michael Hewitt